Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLentz, Lene Wacher
dc.contributor.authorSunde, Nina
dc.coverage.spatialDenmarken_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-16T10:54:40Z
dc.date.available2020-12-16T10:54:40Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1756-4611
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2719778
dc.description.abstractHistorical call data records (HCDR) are frequently used as evidence in criminal trials. However, several inherent uncertainties are associated with HCDR data, and, additionally, errors may occur when law enforcement processes the data. In Denmark, processing errors were introduced into HCDR from 2010 until 2019. The Danish authorities are currently reviewing more than 10,000 criminal cases in order to secure a fair trial. This article conducts a socio-technical analysis of the Danish telecom scandal, which shows that, in addition to the processing errors highlighted,1 sources of error are related to competence, cognitive factors and inadequate quality management.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPario Communications Ltden_US
dc.subjectpolitien_US
dc.subjectpolicingen_US
dc.subjectetterforskningen_US
dc.subjectinvestigationen_US
dc.subjectcall dataen_US
dc.subjectteledataen_US
dc.subjectbevisen_US
dc.subjectevidenceen_US
dc.subjectDanmarken_US
dc.subjectDenmarken_US
dc.titleThe use of historical call data records as evidence in the criminal justice system: Lessons learned from the Danish telecom scandalen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.journalDigital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Reviewen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.14296/deeslr.v18i0.5235


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel